  Golovin-KS-vestnik-ksu-2024-3-ru.pdf |
- 36
- THE NEED FOR LEGAL REGULATION OF THE ‟BLACK BOX” OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
- Golovin K.S. The need for legal regulation of the ‟black box” of artificial intelligence. Vestnik of Kostroma State University, 2024, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 290–297 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.34216/1998-0817-2024-30-3-290-297
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.34216/1998-0817-2024-30-3-290-297
- УДК: 347.77
- EDN: NATZGG
- Publish date: 2024-09-03
- Annotation: This paper discusses the transparency and regulation of Artificial Intelligence (hereinafter the AI). It discusses the growing trend of using decision-making algorithms in various areas of life and the need for transparent and the understandable AI systems. The author highlights the concept of a ‟black box” where algorithms and their processes become hidden to users and developers, and emphasises the importance of explainability and accessibility of information about the operation of the AI. The article also addresses the right to explanation and possible strategies for ensuring transparency and accountability in algorithmic decision-making, including parameter documentation and system certification.
- Keywords: artificial intelligence (AI) transparency, AI black box, AI regulation, algorithmic decision making, AI legal aspects, AI systems’ certification, challenging AI decisions.
- Literature list: Antonov A.A. Iskusstvennyi intellekt kak istochnik povyshennoi opasnosti [Artificial Intelligence as a Source of Increased Danger]. Yurist [Lawyer], 2020, no. 7, pp. 69-74. (In Russ.) Golovin K.S. Predlozheniya po reformirovaniyu grazhdansko-pravovoi okhrany iskusstvennogo intellekta kak edinogo obekta intellektualnoi sobstvennosti [Proposals for the Reform of Civil Law Protection of Artificial Intelligence as a Single Object of Intellectual Property]. Aktualnye problemy gosudarstva i prava [Actual problems of the state and law], 2023, vol. 7, no. 2 (26), pp. 263-274. (In Russ.) Grimm D.D. Osnovy ucheniya o yuridicheskoi sdelke v sovremennoi nemetskoi doktrine pandektnogo prava. Prolegomeny k obshchei teorii grazhdanskogo prava. T. 1 (chast vtoraya) [Fundamentals of the Doctrine of Legal Transaction in Modern German Pandect Law Doctrine. Prolegomena to the General Theory of Civil Law. Vol. 1 (part two)]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava [Civil Law Bulletin], 2015, no. 2, pp. 95. (In Russ.) Gurko A. Iskusstvennyi intellekt i avtorskoe pravo: vzglyad v budushchee [Artificial Intelligence and Copyright: A Look into the Future]. Avtorskoe pravo i smezhnyye prava [Copyright and related rights], 2017, no. 12, pp. 7-18. (In Russ.) Klyashtornyi A.S. Kriticheskoe osmyslenie ontologicheskikh osnovanii kontseptsii “sil'nogoˮ iskusstvennogo intellekta v kontekste problematiki teorii deistviya Kh. Yoyasa [Critical Reflection on the Ontological Foundations of the “Strongˮ Artificial Intelligence Concept in the Context of H. Joas's Theory of Action]. Uralskaya analiticheskaya konferentsiya [Ural analytical conference]. Yekaterinburg, 2014, pp. 106-117. (In Russ.) Konvergentsiya chastnopravovogo regulirovaniya obshchestvennykh otnoshenii skvoz prizmu effektivnosti prava: monografiya [The Convergence of Private Law Regulation of Social Relations through the Prism of Legal Efficiency: monograph], K.A. Abdullaev, A.V. Abramova, E.A. Abyzova et al.; ed. by A.N. Levushkin, E.Kh. Nadysheva. Moscow, Yustitsinform Publ., 2023, 672 p. (In Russ.) Kuteynikov D.L., Izhayev O.A., Zenin S.S., Lebedev V.A. Algoritmicheskaya prozrachnost' i podotchetnost': pravovye podkhody k razresheniyu problemy “Chyornogo yashchikaˮ [Algorithmic Transparency and Accountability: Legal Approaches to Solving the “Black Boxˮ Problem]. Lex Russica, 2020, no. 6 (163), pp. 146. (In Russ.) Melnik S.V. Osnovnye podkhody k opredeleniyu formy zashchity prava v otechestvennoi tsivilisticheskoi doktrine [Main Approaches to Defining the Form of Legal Protection in Domestic Civil Law Doctrine]. Aktualnye voprosy nauki i praktiki: sbornik nauchnykh statei [Current issues of science and practice]. Orel, 2010, p. 20. (In Russ.) Ponkin I.V., Redkina A.I. Iskusstvennyi intellekt s tochki zreniya prava [Artificial Intelligence from the Legal Perspective]. Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Ser.: Yuridicheskie nauki [Bulletin of the Peoples' Friendship University of Russia. Ser.: Legal Sciences], 2018, vol. 22, no. 1, p. 93. (In Russ.) Tiulin A.V. Transformatsiya pravovoi realnosti, vyzvannaya sistemami iskusstvennogo intellekta [Transformation of Legal Reality Caused by Artificial Intelligence Systems]. Aktualnye problemy effektivnosti chastnogo prava: monografiya [Current Problems of the Efficiency of Private Law: monograph], ed. by A.N. Levushkin. Moscow, Yustitsinform Publ., 2022, 464 p. (In Russ.) Vasiliev A.A., Pechatnova Yu.V. Iskusstvennyi intellekt, pravo, problemy i perspektivy [Artificial Intelligence, Law, Problems and Prospects]. Rossiysko-Aziatskii pravovoi zhurnal [Russian-Asian Law Journal], 2020, no. 2, pp. 14-18. (In Russ.) Burrell J. How the machine ‘thinks’: Understanding opacity in machine learning algorithms. Big Data & Society, 2016, vol. 3 (1). URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/epub/10.1177/2053951715622512 (дата обращения: 24.06.2024). Daniel G. Is Intellectual Property Law Ready for Artificial Intelligence? GRUR International, 2020, vol. 69, iss. 2, pp. 117-118. https://doi.org/10.1093/grurint/ikz025 (access date: 24.06.2024). Goodman B., Flaxman S. European Union Regulations on Algorithmic Decision-Making and a “Right to Explanation”. AI Magazine, 2017, vol. 38 (3), pp. 50-57. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v38i3.2741 Kaminski M.E. The Right to Explanation, Explained. U of Colorado Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 18-24. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2019, vol. 34, no. 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3196985 (access date: 24.06.2024). Pasquale F.A. The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms that Control Money and Information. Book Gallery, 2015, vol. 96. URL: https://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/books/96 (access date: 24.06.2024) Selbst A.D., Powles J. Meaningful Information and the Right to Explanation. International Data Privacy Law, 2017, vol. 7 (4), pp. 233-242. URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3039125 (access date: 24.06.2024). Wachter S., Mittelstadt B., Floridi L. Transparent, Explainable, and Accountable AI for Robotics. Science Robotics, 2017, vol. 2. URL: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10038294/1/Wachter_Transparent_explainable_accountable_AI.pdf (access date: 24.06.2024).