  Kobzarev-FM-vestnik-ksu-2023-3-ru.pdf |
- 33
- ORGANISATIONAL AND LEGAL BASIS FOR DETERMINING THE CRITERIA FOR THE SUFFICIENCY OF EVIDENCE IN THE PRE-TRIAL STAGES OF CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS
- Kobzarev F.M. Organisational and legal basis for determining the criteria for the sufficiency of evidence in the pre-trial stages of criminal proceedings. Vestnik of Kostroma State University, 2023, vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 240–244. (In Russ.). https:// doi.org/10.34216/1998-0817-2023-29-3-240-244
- DOI: https//doi.org/10.34216/1998-0817-2023-29-3-240-244
- УДК: 343.13
- EDN: NEYBKJ
- Publish date: 2023-09-30
- Annotation: Given the importance of the final stage of proof in criminal cases, which consists in assessing the sufficiency of evidence, the article deals with the legal and organisational foundations of the possibility of determining the criteria for this sufficiency. At the same time, the author’s definition of the concept of ‟sufficiency of evidence” is given, the need to establish the boundaries of this property of evidence is substantiated, and the analysis of publications devoted to determining the criteria for assessing the sufficiency of evidence is carried out. General scientific methods and private scientific methods were used in the study. As a conclusion, it is proposed to divide the criteria for the sufficiency of evidence into legal (provided for by the current Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation) and organisational (established in joint organisational and administrative documents of law enforcement agencies, in reviews of judicial practice, explanations of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation).
- Keywords: proof in criminal cases, sufficiency of evidence, criteria for assessing evidence sufficiency, legal and organisational basis for evidence sufficiency.
- Literature list: Bobrov V.K., Voznjuk E.P. Nekotorye voprosy obespechenija dostatochnosti dokazatel'stv v dosudebnom proizvodstve [Some issues of ensuring the sufficiency of evidence in pre-trial proceedings]. Rossijskij sledovatel' [Russian investigator], 2021, No. 10, pp. 16-19. (In Russ.) Jani P.S. Dostatochnost' dokazatel'stv po delam o vzjatochnichestve [Sufficiency of evidence in bribery cases]. Zakonnost' [Legality], 2018, No. 9. URL: https://www.consultant.ru (access date: 11.07.2023). (In Russ.) Karapetov A.G., Kosarev A.S. Standarty dokazyvanija: analiticheskoe i jempiricheskoe issledovanie [Standards of evidence: analytical and empirical research]. Vestnik jekonomicheskogo pravosudija Rossijskoj Federacii [Bulletin of economic justice of the Russian Federation], 2019, No. 5, special issue. URL: https://www.consultant.ru (access date: 11.07.2023). (In Russ.) Karjakin E.A. Cel' i bremja dokazyvanija primenitel'no k formirovaniju sudebnoj istiny po ugolovnomu delu v sude pervoj instancii [The purpose and burden of proof in relation to the formation of judicial truth in a criminal case in the court of first instance]. Rossijskij sud'ja [Russian judge], 2016, No. 5, pp. 22-26. (In Russ.) Kobzarev F.M., Kobzarev P.F. Osobennosti vzaimodejstvija suda i prokurora v processe dokazyvanija v hode dosudebnogo proizvodstva po ugolovnomu delu [Features of interaction between the court and the prosecutor in the process of evidence during pre-trial proceedings in a criminal case]. Vestnik Kostromskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Vestnik of Kostroma State University], 2022, vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 209-219. (In Russ.) Kozlova N. Kak sokratit' vremja rassledovanija i pochemu nuzhny edinye kriterii dostatochnosti sobrannyh dokazatel'stv. Interv'ju Aleksandra Bastrykina [How to reduce investigation time and why uniform criteria for the sufficiency of collected evidence are needed. Interview with Alexander Bastrykin]. URL: https://rg.ru/2022/09/27/horosho-sledovatelno-vovremia.html (access date: 27.07.2023). (In Russ.) Kostenko R.V. Sostojanie dokazannosti kak ocenochnaja kategorija v ugolovno-processual'nom prave [State of evidence as an evaluative category in criminal procedural law]. Pravovaja paradigma [Legal Concept], 2019, vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 35-41. (In Russ.) Lotynskij A.M. Standarty dokazyvanija po ugolovnomu delu [Standards of evidence in a criminal case]. Rossijskoe pravosudie [Russian justice], 2015, No. 10, pp. 106-109. (In Russ.) Lupinskaja P.A. Reshenija v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. Ih vidy, soderzhanie i formy [Decisions in criminal proceedings. Their types, content and forms]. Moscow, 1976, 168 p. (In Russ.) Popova L.V. Aktual'nye voprosy dostatochnosti ocenki dokazatel'stv [Current issues of sufficiency of evidence assessment]. Zakonnost' [Legality], 2015, No. 3. URL: https://www.consultant.ru (access date: 11.07.2023). (In Russ.) Skoblik K.V. Dostatochnost' kak rezul'tat vzaimodejstvija zakonov dvuh logic [Sufficiency as a result of the interaction of the laws of two logics]. Rossijskij juridicheskij zhurna [Russian legal journal], 2019, No. 3, pp. 94-101. (In Russ.) Smola A.A. Standarty, dokazyvanie i Verhovnyj Sud [Standards, evidence and the Supreme Court]. Vestnik jekonomicheskogo pravosudija Rossijskoj Federacii [Bulletin of Economic Justice of the Russian Federation], 2018, No. 8. URL: https://www.consultant.ru (access date: 11.07.2023). (In Russ.) Zotov D.V. Predely dlja predelov dokazyvanija [Limits for the limits of proof]. Zakonnost' [Legality], 2014, No. 9. URL: https://www.consultant.ru (access date: 11.07.2023). (In Russ.)