- Fiodor M. Kobzarev
- Kostroma State University
- Pavel F. Kobzarev
- Russian Academy of Advocacy and Notary Arts
- FEATURES OF INTERACTION BETWEEN THE COURT AND THE PROSECUTOR IN THE PROCESS OF PROOF DURING PRE-TRIAL PROCEEDINGS IN A CRIMINAL CASE
- Kobzarev P.F., Kobzarev F.M. Features of interaction between the court and the prosecutor in the process of proof during pre-trial proceedings in a criminal case. Vestnik of Kostroma State University, 2022, vol. 28, № 3, pp. 214–219 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.34216/1998-0817-2022-28-3-214-219
- Publish date:
Proceeding from the common human rights goals of the court and the prosecutor to achieve the appointment of criminal proceedings and the relationship of their powers in the pre-trial stages, the article discusses the content and features of the procedural interaction of these participants in the process of evidence. As an example, on the basis of an analysis of the procedure for consideration by the court of complaints in accordance with Article 125 of the Russian Code of Criminal Procedure, attention is drawn to the essence of the participation in evidence in such cases of the court and the prosecutor; the legal and law enforcement problems of the exercise of their powers and various options for their solution are proposed. At the same time, the importance of ensuring the correct combination of control and supervisory powers of these participants in the criminal process is indicated; moreover, taking into account the content of the resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Russian Federation on the category of materials updated in 2022, the need for a clearer legislative definition of the limits of evidence, increasing the assets, is justified. In addition, the directions of improving the procedure for considering such complaints, the need to comply with the sequence of their reception for consideration are specified. The study used general scientific methods (analysis, deduction) and private scientific methods (formal-logical, comparative jurisprudence, etc.). As conclusions, it is proposed to make a number of additions to the criminal procedure law, including Article 37 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation and other norms.
court’s and prosecutor’s procedural interaction, pre-trial stages, evidence, consideration of complaints, limits of evidence, sequence of complaint consideration.
- Literature list:
Bagmet A.M. Ob ustranenii dvoevlastiya v ugolovnom presledovanii [On the Elimination of Dual Power in Criminal Prosecution]. Rossijskaya yusticiya [Russian Justice], 2013, No 12, pp. 57-58.
Golikov K.N. Otdel'nye organizacionnye i pravovye aspekty prokurorskoj deyatel'nosti [Separate organizational and legal aspects of prosecutorial activity]. Rossijskoe pravosudie [Russian justice], 2019, No 10, pp. 106-112. (In Russ.)
Kobzarev F.M. Ob uchastii prokurora v dokazyvanii po ugolovnym delam v dosudebnom proizvodstve [On the participation of the prosecutor in the evidence in criminal cases in pre-trial proceedings]. Sbornik statej XVIII Vserossijskih dekabr'skih yuridicheskih chtenij v Kostrome; Vseros. nauch.-prakt. konf. (9–10 dekabrya 2021 goda, g. Kostroma) [Collection of articles of the XVIII All-Russian December legal readings in Kostroma. All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference (December 9–10, 2021, Kostroma)]. Kostroma, KSU Publ., 2022, pp. 18-25.
Nikitina S.V. Processual'naya forma i obosnovannost' sudebnyh reshenij v dosudebnom proizvodstve po ugolovnym delam [Procedural form and validity of court decisions in pre-trial proceedings in criminal cases]. Yuridicheskij vestnik Kubanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Legal Bulletin of the Kuban State University], 2021, No 1, pp. 72-79.
Spitsyn A.V. Prokuror kak sub"ekt dokazyvaniya v dosudebnyh stadiyah ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva [Prosecutor as a subject of evidence in pre-trial stages of criminal proceedings]. Vestnik Ural'skogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii [Vestnik Uralskogo yurytskogo instituta MVD Rossii], 2016, No 4, pp. 66-68.
Ustinov A.A. O procedure sudebnogo kontrolya po rassmotreniyu sudom zhalob v poryadke st. 125 UPK RF [On the procedure of judicial control over the consideration of complaints by the court in the order of Article 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation]. Zakonnost' [Legality], 2020, No 7, pp. 46-49.
Franziforov Yu.V., Solovyova N.A., Shinkarchuk V.V. Osobennosti vzaimodejstviya prokurora, organov sledstviya i suda v dosudebnom proizvodstve po ugolovnomu delu [Features of interaction between the prosecutor, investigative bodies and the court in pre-trial proceedings in a criminal case]. Legal paradigm [Pravovaya paradigma], 2021, vol. 20, No 2, pp. 49-56.
Tsvetkov Yu.A. Krizis social'no-pravovoj identichnosti sledovatelya i prokurora [The Crisis of Social and Legal Identity of the Investigator and the Prosecutor]. Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo [Criminal Proceedings], 2014, No 1, pp. 14-20.
- Fiodor M. Kobzarev, Doctor of Jural Sciences, Professor, Kostroma State University, Kostroma, Russia, firstname.lastname@example.org
- Pavel F. Kobzarev, Russian Academy of Advocacy and Notary Arts, Moscow, Russia, email@example.com