16
Alyona E. Isakhanyan
A.M. Gorky Institute of World Literature of the Russian Academy of Sciences
The relationship between the concepts “Moscow, third Rome” and “Moscow, new Israel” and their role in the epilogue to Collection of 1647
Isakhanyan A.E. The relationship between the concepts “Moscow, third Rome” and “Moscow, new Israel” and their role in the epilogue to Collection of 1647. Vestnik of Kostroma State University, 2020, vol. 26, № 3, pp. 122–127 (In Russ.). DOI https://doi.org/10.34216/1998-0817-2020-26-3-122-127
DOI: https://doi.org/10.34216/1998-0817-2020-26-3-122-127
УДК: 821.161.1.0
Publish date: 2020-06-20
Annotation: In the ancient Russian writings of the Moscow State era, the formulas “Moscow, third Rome” and “Moscow, new Israel” or “new Jerusalem” are noticeably widespread. By the early 17th century they developed into full-fledged concepts that serve as means of self-identification. The idea of “Moscow, new Jerusalem” did not receive a clear theoretical form, although it was more widespread in writings. This leads to the fact that it is often understood by researchers only as a verbal formula. In the article, it is considered as an original alternative concept that allows to adjust the specific content of the theory “Moscow, third Rome”. The genesis of these two concepts, their theoretical and ideological content, as well as their fate in the literature and historical and political discourse of the 17th century are traced. The question of the relationship between the political and church ambitions of Muscovy, expressed in these theories, is investigated. This perspective allows us to consider the choice of the scribes of the formula "new Jerusalem" in the epilogue to the Collection of 1647 as a kind of marker indicating the socio-political tonality of the writing. The author of the article proceeds from the conviction that extraliterary factors are of no less importance than literary factors in studies of Old Russian literature.
Keywords: Collection, Muscovy, third Rome, new Jerusalem, historiosophy, historical literature, ideology in literature, Triumph of Orthodoxy
Funding and acknowledgments: The reported study was funded by RFBR, project number 19-312-90058
Literature list: Bauer E.A. Ideia “Moskva – tretii Rim” v russkoi obshchestvennoi mysli kontsa XV – nachala XVII vv.: otechestvennaia istoriografiia XX stoletiia: Monografiia [The idea of “Moscow – the third Rome” in Russian social thought of the late 15th – early 17th centuries: Russian historiography of the 20th century: Monograph.]. Nizhnevartovsk, 2011, 127 p. (In Russ.) Gol'dberg A.L. K predystorii idei “Moskva – Tretii Rim” [To the background of the idea “Moscow – the Third Rome”]. Kul'turnoe nasledie Drevnei Rusi (Istoki. Stanovlenie. Traditsii) [Cultural heritage of Ancient Russia (Origins. Formation. Traditions)]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1976, pp. 111–116. (In Russ.) Efimov N.I. “Rus' – Novyi Izrail'”: Teokraticheskaia ideologiia svoezemnogo pravoslaviia v dopetrovskoi pis'mennosti [“Russia – New Israel”: Theocratic ideology of homeland Orthodoxy in pre-Petrine writing]. Kazan', 1912. 50 p. (In Russ.) Zhitie Aleksandra Nevskogo [Life of Alexander Nevsky]. Biblioteka literatury Drevnej Rusi [Library of literature of Ancient Russia]. St. Petersburg, Nauka Publ., 1997, vol. 5. [13th century], pp. 358–369. (In Russ.) Lenkhoff G.D. Stepennaia kniga: zamysel, ideologiia, adresatsiia [The Book of Degrees: Concept, Ideology, Addressing]. Stepennaia kniga tsarskogo rodosloviia po drevneishim spiskam: Teksty i kommentarii: V 3 t. [The Book of Degrees of the Tsar's Genealogy according to the most ancient lists: Texts and commentary: in 3 volumes.] Vol. 1, pp. 120–146. (In Russ.) Lotman Iu.M., Uspenskii B.A. Otzvuki kontseptsii “Moskva – tretii Rim” v ideologii Petra Pervogo (K probleme srednevekovoi traditsii v kul'ture barokko) [Echoes of the concept “Moscow – the third Rome” in the ideology of Peter the Great (On the problem of medieval tradition in the culture of the Baroque)]. Lotman Iu.M. Istoriia i tipologiia russkoi kul'tury [History and typology of Russian culture.]. St. Petersburg, Iskusstvo Publ., 2002. pp. 349–362. (In Russ.) Povest o zhitii tsaria Fedora Ivanovicha [Tale of the Life of Tsar Fedor Ivanovich]. Biblioteka literatury Drevnei Rusi [Library of literature of Ancient Russia]. St. Petersburg, Nauka Publ., 2006, Vol. 14: Konets XVI – nachalo XVII veka [End of the 16th – beginning of the 17th century], pp. 54–103. (In Russ.) Ranchin A.M. Teoriia “Moskva – Tretii Rim” i ee mesto v russkoi kul'ture XVI–XVIII vv. [The theory “Moscow – the Third Rome” and its place in Russian culture of the 16th–18th centuries] Obrazovatel'nyi portal «Slovo». Filologiia. [B. g.] [Educational portal “Word”. Philology] URL: https://www.portal-slovo.ru/philology/44938.php (acсess date: 18.05.2020). (In Russ.) Sinitsyna N.V. Tretii Rim: Istoki i evoliutsiia russkoi srednevekovoi kontseptsii (XV–XVI vv.) [Third Rome: The origins and evolution of the Russian medieval concept (15–16 centuries)]. Moscow, Indrik Publ., 1998. 416 p. (In Russ.) Slovo o Zakone i Blagodati mitropolita Ilariona [Metropolitan Hilarion's Tale about the Law and Grace]. Pamjatniki literatury Drevnej Rusi [Literary Monuments of Ancient Rus]. XVII v., vol. III, Moscow, 1994, pp. 583–619. (In Russ.) Sobornik. Moscow, 1647, 881 p. (In Russ.) Strakhov A.B. Istoriosofskie paralleli kontseptsii “Tsar'grad Tyrnov” i “Moskva — tretii Rim” [Historiosophical parallels of the concept of “Tsargrad Tarnov” and “Moscow – the third Rome”]. Germenevtika drevnerusskoi literatury [Hermeneutics of Old Russian Literature]. Moscow, IWL RAS Publ., 2020, issue 19, pp. 430–439. (In Russ.) Usachev A.S. Tretii Rim ili Tretii Kiev? (Moskovskoe tsarstvo XVI v. v vospriiatii sovremennikov) [Third Rome or Third Kiev? (Muscovy of the 16th century in the perception of contemporaries)]. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost' [Social sciences and modernity], 2012, № 1, pp. 69–87. Uspenskii B.A. Boris i Gleb: Vospriiatie istorii v Drevnei Rusi [Boris and Gleb: Perception of history in Ancient Rus.]. Moscow, Iazyki russkoi kul'tury Publ., 2000. 128 р. (In Russ.) Hvorostinin Ivan Andreevich “Slovesa dnej, i carej, i svjatitelej moskovskih” [“Words of the Days, and Tsars, and Saints of Moscow”]. Biblioteka literatury Drevnej Rusi [Library of literature of Ancient Russia]. St. Petersburg, Nauka Publ., 2006, Vol. 14: Konec XVI — nachalo XVII veka [End of the 16th – beginning of the 17th century], pp. 610–641. (In Russ.)
Author's info: Alyona E. Isakhanyan, ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7241-9669, postgraduate student, researcher of A.M. Gorky Institute of World Literature of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia. E-mail: tiwe@inbox.ru